Imran Khan very badly injured by falling from stage at rally in Pakistan

07.05.13 / News / Author: / Comments: (0)
Tags: , , , ,

Imran Khan Niazi, is a Pakistani politician, celebrity and former cricketer.

One of Pakistan’s most prominent politicians, the former cricket star Imran Khan, has been injured in a fall from a stage during a political rally.

One of the leaders of Khan’s Movement for Justice party, Ijaz Chaudhry, said the politician had been taken to a hospital after the incident, in the eastern city of Lahore, but his injuries were not life-threatening.

Local television footage showed supporters carrying Khan away from the rally. His face was bloody and he appeared to be unconscious.

Khan fell at least five metres (15ft) from what appeared to be a makeshift elevator raising him up to the stage.

According to reports in local newspapers, the platform may have become unsteady because of the large number of people standing on it.

Fate of GOP hopefuls rests with undecided voters (AP)

01.01.12 / News / Author: / Comments: (0)

LE MARS, Iowa – The volatile Republican presidential race in Iowa will come down to which way an enormous chunk of undecided voters breaks in the coming days.

With the first-in-the-nation voting of the 2012 race for the White House looming Tuesday, Mitt Romney is contending for victory in a state that eluded him four years ago, while Rick Santorum — a hero among social conservatives — surges and libertarian-leaning Ron Paul slides in a contest that remains incredibly fluid.

With many factors at play, the dynamics can shift rapidly.

Yet, two things were clear on the final weekend before the caucuses: The yearlong effort to establish a consensus challenger to Romney had so far come up short, and Romney’s carefully laid plan to survive Iowa may succeed because conservative voters have so far failed to unite behind one candidate.

“It may be Romney’s to lose at this point,” said John Stineman, an Iowa GOP campaign strategist. “And it’s a battle among the rest.”

Underscoring the unpredictability of the race, a new poll by The Des Moines Register showed that a remarkable 41 percent of likely caucus-goers say they were undecided or still might change their minds.

Romney had 24 percent support among likely voters while Paul had 22 percent, meaning they were statistically even at the front of the pack. Santorum was third with 15 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich, with 12 percent, and Rick Perry, with 11 percent. Michele Bachmann, a one-time Iowa favorite, brought up the rear with 7 percent.

However, in a sign of how quickly things can change, the last two days of the poll — taken Tuesday through Friday — found Santorum with momentum and Paul losing his. Heading into the weekend, Romney held a narrow lead, but Santorum was right behind him with 21 percent while Paul had fallen to 18 percent.

On Sunday, the candidates were making their closing arguments, both in appearances across Iowa as well as on national television, while volunteers and staffers canvassed the state to start mobilizing backers.

Paul, who was at home in Texas for the weekend, was making the rounds of Sunday talk shows, while Santorum, Perry and Bachmann were doing the same from Iowa.

Interviewed on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Paul discounted the impact of Santorum’s surge on his own campaign.

“It’s the people who got frustrated with the other ones and they’re just shifting their views,” he said. “That’s one thing you can’t say about my supporters. They don’t shift their views.”

Paul predicted a strong showing Tuesday, saying he would likely finish first or second.

Romney planned appearances in Atlantic and Council Bluffs as he works to maximize the edge he holds in critical areas rather than risk underperforming in places where more ardent conservatives are leery of his Mormon faith and shifting positions on social issues.

In Le Mars on Sunday, he drew a crowd of 300 people, including supporter Alan Lucken, who shouted to the candidate: “You’re going to win.”

“I’m planning on it,” Romney said and later told a reporter, “I sure hope to. I’ll tell you that.”

In another show of confidence, Romney promised to return if he is the GOP nominee.

“I’m going to be back in Iowa; we’re going to fight, we’re going to win Iowa in the general election,” Romney said as he closed his remarks in Le Mars.

Santorum, meanwhile, looked to capitalize on his recent surge by focusing on southern portions of rural Iowa, where the former Pennsylvania senator has made a point of visiting more often than his rivals. And his campaign rolled out a new TV ad casting him as “a trusted conservative who gives us the best chance to take back America.”

He claimed momentum Saturday — and acknowledged his opponents had more money — as he traveled with his daughter Liz, who quit college to campaign for her father.

“We believe that ultimately, money doesn’t matter in Iowa,” Santorum said at a packed stop in Indianola. “You can’t buy Iowa. You’ve got to go out and work for Iowa votes.”

Perry’s advisers see Santorum within reach and have begun attacking the former senator for having supported spending on home-state pet projects, an unpopular position in these tough economic times.

“I think the world of Rick Santorum. He’s got a great family. But we’ve got some real difference when it comes to fiscal issues,” Perry told supporters in Boone. “Those differences couldn’t be clearer when it comes to important issues in this election like spending.”

Santorum, in turn, charged Perry with hypocrisy: “He had a paid lobbyist in Washington looking for earmarks.”

Perry announced he would travel directly from Iowa to Greenville, S.C., the day after the caucuses, bypassing next-up New Hampshire. Still, he said he planned to participate in two debates in New Hampshire next weekend.

Gingrich, for his part, was spending the weekend pleading anew with Iowans to side with him despite what they have learned about him through millions of dollars in attack advertising by Paul and a political action committee bankrolled by Romney supporters.

“Iowa could actually dramatically change people’s understanding of what works in politics if you repudiate that kind of negativity,” Gingrich told 150 people at a Council Bluffs restaurant.

___

Associated Press writers Holly Ramer in Campton, N.H., Steve People in Hampton, N.H., and Shannon McCaffrey in Council Bluffs, Iowa, and Brian Bakst in Urbandale, Iowa, contributed to this report.

.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forum | Hud Software

Fate of GOP hopefuls rests with undecided voters (AP)

01.01.12 / News / Author: / Comments: (0)

LE MARS, Iowa – The volatile Republican presidential race in Iowa will come down to which way an enormous chunk of undecided voters breaks in the coming days.

With the first-in-the-nation voting of the 2012 race for the White House looming Tuesday, Mitt Romney is contending for victory in a state that eluded him four years ago, while Rick Santorum — a hero among social conservatives — surges and libertarian-leaning Ron Paul slides in a contest that remains incredibly fluid.

With many factors at play, the dynamics can shift rapidly.

Yet, two things were clear on the final weekend before the caucuses: The yearlong effort to establish a consensus challenger to Romney had so far come up short, and Romney’s carefully laid plan to survive Iowa may succeed because conservative voters have so far failed to unite behind one candidate.

“It may be Romney’s to lose at this point,” said John Stineman, an Iowa GOP campaign strategist. “And it’s a battle among the rest.”

Underscoring the unpredictability of the race, a new poll by The Des Moines Register showed that a remarkable 41 percent of likely caucus-goers say they were undecided or still might change their minds.

Romney had 24 percent support among likely voters while Paul had 22 percent, meaning they were statistically even at the front of the pack. Santorum was third with 15 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich, with 12 percent, and Rick Perry, with 11 percent. Michele Bachmann, a one-time Iowa favorite, brought up the rear with 7 percent.

However, in a sign of how quickly things can change, the last two days of the poll — taken Tuesday through Friday — found Santorum with momentum and Paul losing his. Heading into the weekend, Romney held a narrow lead, but Santorum was right behind him with 21 percent while Paul had fallen to 18 percent.

On Sunday, the candidates were making their closing arguments, both in appearances across Iowa as well as on national television, while volunteers and staffers canvassed the state to start mobilizing backers.

Paul, who was at home in Texas for the weekend, was making the rounds of Sunday talk shows, while Santorum, Perry and Bachmann were doing the same from Iowa.

Interviewed on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Paul discounted the impact of Santorum’s surge on his own campaign.

“It’s the people who got frustrated with the other ones and they’re just shifting their views,” he said. “That’s one thing you can’t say about my supporters. They don’t shift their views.”

Paul predicted a strong showing Tuesday, saying he would likely finish first or second.

Romney planned appearances in Atlantic and Council Bluffs as he works to maximize the edge he holds in critical areas rather than risk underperforming in places where more ardent conservatives are leery of his Mormon faith and shifting positions on social issues.

In Le Mars on Sunday, he drew a crowd of 300 people, including supporter Alan Lucken, who shouted to the candidate: “You’re going to win.”

“I’m planning on it,” Romney said and later told a reporter, “I sure hope to. I’ll tell you that.”

In another show of confidence, Romney promised to return if he is the GOP nominee.

“I’m going to be back in Iowa; we’re going to fight, we’re going to win Iowa in the general election,” Romney said as he closed his remarks in Le Mars.

Santorum, meanwhile, looked to capitalize on his recent surge by focusing on southern portions of rural Iowa, where the former Pennsylvania senator has made a point of visiting more often than his rivals. And his campaign rolled out a new TV ad casting him as “a trusted conservative who gives us the best chance to take back America.”

He claimed momentum Saturday — and acknowledged his opponents had more money — as he traveled with his daughter Liz, who quit college to campaign for her father.

“We believe that ultimately, money doesn’t matter in Iowa,” Santorum said at a packed stop in Indianola. “You can’t buy Iowa. You’ve got to go out and work for Iowa votes.”

Perry’s advisers see Santorum within reach and have begun attacking the former senator for having supported spending on home-state pet projects, an unpopular position in these tough economic times.

“I think the world of Rick Santorum. He’s got a great family. But we’ve got some real difference when it comes to fiscal issues,” Perry told supporters in Boone. “Those differences couldn’t be clearer when it comes to important issues in this election like spending.”

Santorum, in turn, charged Perry with hypocrisy: “He had a paid lobbyist in Washington looking for earmarks.”

Perry announced he would travel directly from Iowa to Greenville, S.C., the day after the caucuses, bypassing next-up New Hampshire. Still, he said he planned to participate in two debates in New Hampshire next weekend.

Gingrich, for his part, was spending the weekend pleading anew with Iowans to side with him despite what they have learned about him through millions of dollars in attack advertising by Paul and a political action committee bankrolled by Romney supporters.

“Iowa could actually dramatically change people’s understanding of what works in politics if you repudiate that kind of negativity,” Gingrich told 150 people at a Council Bluffs restaurant.

___

Associated Press writers Holly Ramer in Campton, N.H., Steve People in Hampton, N.H., and Shannon McCaffrey in Council Bluffs, Iowa, and Brian Bakst in Urbandale, Iowa, contributed to this report.

.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forum | Hud Software

Fate of GOP hopefuls rests with undecided voters (AP)

01.01.12 / News / Author: / Comments: (0)

LE MARS, Iowa – The volatile Republican presidential race in Iowa will come down to which way an enormous chunk of undecided voters breaks in the coming days.

With the first-in-the-nation voting of the 2012 race for the White House looming Tuesday, Mitt Romney is contending for victory in a state that eluded him four years ago, while Rick Santorum — a hero among social conservatives — surges and libertarian-leaning Ron Paul slides in a contest that remains incredibly fluid.

With many factors at play, the dynamics can shift rapidly.

Yet, two things were clear on the final weekend before the caucuses: The yearlong effort to establish a consensus challenger to Romney had so far come up short, and Romney’s carefully laid plan to survive Iowa may succeed because conservative voters have so far failed to unite behind one candidate.

“It may be Romney’s to lose at this point,” said John Stineman, an Iowa GOP campaign strategist. “And it’s a battle among the rest.”

Underscoring the unpredictability of the race, a new poll by The Des Moines Register showed that a remarkable 41 percent of likely caucus-goers say they were undecided or still might change their minds.

Romney had 24 percent support among likely voters while Paul had 22 percent, meaning they were statistically even at the front of the pack. Santorum was third with 15 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich, with 12 percent, and Rick Perry, with 11 percent. Michele Bachmann, a one-time Iowa favorite, brought up the rear with 7 percent.

However, in a sign of how quickly things can change, the last two days of the poll — taken Tuesday through Friday — found Santorum with momentum and Paul losing his. Heading into the weekend, Romney held a narrow lead, but Santorum was right behind him with 21 percent while Paul had fallen to 18 percent.

On Sunday, the candidates were making their closing arguments, both in appearances across Iowa as well as on national television, while volunteers and staffers canvassed the state to start mobilizing backers.

Paul, who was at home in Texas for the weekend, was making the rounds of Sunday talk shows, while Santorum, Perry and Bachmann were doing the same from Iowa.

Interviewed on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Paul discounted the impact of Santorum’s surge on his own campaign.

“It’s the people who got frustrated with the other ones and they’re just shifting their views,” he said. “That’s one thing you can’t say about my supporters. They don’t shift their views.”

Paul predicted a strong showing Tuesday, saying he would likely finish first or second.

Romney planned appearances in Atlantic and Council Bluffs as he works to maximize the edge he holds in critical areas rather than risk underperforming in places where more ardent conservatives are leery of his Mormon faith and shifting positions on social issues.

In Le Mars on Sunday, he drew a crowd of 300 people, including supporter Alan Lucken, who shouted to the candidate: “You’re going to win.”

“I’m planning on it,” Romney said and later told a reporter, “I sure hope to. I’ll tell you that.”

In another show of confidence, Romney promised to return if he is the GOP nominee.

“I’m going to be back in Iowa; we’re going to fight, we’re going to win Iowa in the general election,” Romney said as he closed his remarks in Le Mars.

Santorum, meanwhile, looked to capitalize on his recent surge by focusing on southern portions of rural Iowa, where the former Pennsylvania senator has made a point of visiting more often than his rivals. And his campaign rolled out a new TV ad casting him as “a trusted conservative who gives us the best chance to take back America.”

He claimed momentum Saturday — and acknowledged his opponents had more money — as he traveled with his daughter Liz, who quit college to campaign for her father.

“We believe that ultimately, money doesn’t matter in Iowa,” Santorum said at a packed stop in Indianola. “You can’t buy Iowa. You’ve got to go out and work for Iowa votes.”

Perry’s advisers see Santorum within reach and have begun attacking the former senator for having supported spending on home-state pet projects, an unpopular position in these tough economic times.

“I think the world of Rick Santorum. He’s got a great family. But we’ve got some real difference when it comes to fiscal issues,” Perry told supporters in Boone. “Those differences couldn’t be clearer when it comes to important issues in this election like spending.”

Santorum, in turn, charged Perry with hypocrisy: “He had a paid lobbyist in Washington looking for earmarks.”

Perry announced he would travel directly from Iowa to Greenville, S.C., the day after the caucuses, bypassing next-up New Hampshire. Still, he said he planned to participate in two debates in New Hampshire next weekend.

Gingrich, for his part, was spending the weekend pleading anew with Iowans to side with him despite what they have learned about him through millions of dollars in attack advertising by Paul and a political action committee bankrolled by Romney supporters.

“Iowa could actually dramatically change people’s understanding of what works in politics if you repudiate that kind of negativity,” Gingrich told 150 people at a Council Bluffs restaurant.

___

Associated Press writers Holly Ramer in Campton, N.H., Steve People in Hampton, N.H., and Shannon McCaffrey in Council Bluffs, Iowa, and Brian Bakst in Urbandale, Iowa, contributed to this report.

.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forum | Hud Software

Bright spots, dark clouds — Obama seeks right tone (AP)

01.01.12 / News / Author: / Comments: (0)

WASHINGTON – Bullish yet wary, President Barack Obama is highlighting recent economic bright spots while taking care not to overstate a recovery that still has not put millions back to work.

His Republican rivals, in the face of late-arriving economic good news, are making slight adjustments themselves, arguing that Obama’s policies have been a drag on a recovery that could have taken hold sooner.

The competing rhetoric reflects the positive indicators in areas ranging from retail sales and housing to unemployment and falling gas prices. All this has pushed up consumer confidence, a potential barometer of political attitudes. Even Congress and Obama managed to agree on a two-month payroll tax cut extension before leaving Washington for the holidays.

But the economic signs could prove fleeting, as they were in the early spring when economist also detected upticks in activity only to watch them tumble. These new indicators may hold more promise. But a looming European debt crisis is casting a pall.

No one is more aware of that risk than Obama.

“We’ve got an economy that is showing some positive signs; we’ve seen many consecutive months of private sector job growth,” Obama said last week before departing for Christmas in Hawaii. “But it’s not happening as fast as it needs to.”

For Obama, the danger is in promoting an economy that while, slowly recovering, has yet to reflect reality for millions of Americans, or in highlighting positive signs only to see them falter in 2012.

For David Axelrod, the Obama campaign’s top political adviser, visions of a European financial meltdown are what keep him awake at night.

“I think the American economy is gaining strength, I don’t think many would argue that point,” he said. “The imponderable is not about that, it’s really about these externalities and particularly Europe. Especially now that we’ve passed this threshold on the payroll tax cut and assuming that the Republicans in Congress don’t want to rerun that battle, the one big thing on the horizon is Europe.”

Indeed, as the year ends on an up note, leading economists surveyed by The Associated Press expect the economy will grow slightly faster in 2012 — about 2.4 percent compared with the less than 2 percent annual growth that the economy is expected to register by the end of this year.

But underscoring the political challenges facing Obama, these same economists don’t expect unemployment to drop much in a year from November’s 8.6 percent rate.

The public’s economic outlook is improving. An Associated Press-GfK poll in December found that 37 percent of those questioned expect improvement in the economy in the coming year. It was the first time since May that the sentiment significantly outweighed the share saying the economy would get worse in the next year.

This modestly rosy scenario is contingent on keeping any financial disruptions in Europe contained to the other side of the Atlantic. Obama has pressing European leaders, particularly German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy, to act swiftly to avoid a wholesale debt crisis from taking hold. But Obama has few tools other than persuasion with which to influence an outcome.

In a trend the Obama camp is sure to watch, the public is holding Obama more accountable for the economy. The AP-GfK poll found that the percentage who says Obama deserves little or no blame for the economy’s sluggishness has declined from 43 percent in October to 36 percent now.

Republicans are watching, too.

After months of asserting that conditions under Obama have worsened, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney this past acknowledged signs of improvement, but gave Obama no credit.

“I think the economy’s getting better. I sure hope so,” Romney told CNN on Wednesday. “There’s never been a time when our economy has not recovered from recession. We will recover, but it will not be thanks to the president’s policies. It will be in spite of the president’s policies.”

Republican pollster Wes Anderson, a veteran of congressional and presidential contests, says the first quarter of 2012 could lay down crucial markers that could affect the election results.

“If the uptick in economic indicators that we’ve seen here this month continues into the next month at the same general pace, it will be an interesting race and it will be very close, and there will be an opportunity for Obama to win,” he said. “If economic conditions deteriorate at all, I think he’s done.

“If they pick up significantly in the first quarter — I don’t know what that is, but something that is tangible for middle-class America — he probably gets re-elected,” Anderson said.

The White House is ready to have the president maintain a high economic profile, showcasing his bailout of the auto industry as a concrete example of an administration policy that saved job. Beyond that, Obama’s team wants to portray the president as a champion of the middle class.

“The battle is really over the long term because the Republicans have a fundamental theory that we can cut our way to prosperity — cut taxes for the wealthy, cut regulations, especially for Wall Street, and the economy will flourish,” Axelrod said. “We’ve tested that theory and it failed. Badly.”

“This notion that he’s been there, we should fire him and we should go back to what we were doing before the crisis is not a very strong argument,” Axelrod said. “And obviously to the degree that the economy improves it becomes less of an argument.”

Still, even economists friendly to the administration see contradictory signals in the end-of-year upswing.

On the positive side, the number of people applying for unemployment benefits has dropped to the lowest level since April 2008. At the same time, November’s dip in unemployment from 9 percent to 8.6 percent was partly the result of frustrated workers leaving the labor force and no longer looking to be hired. The private sector is hiring, but states, school districts and local municipalities are shedding jobs. Also, despite an increase in consumer spending, Americans are not seeing real income growth.

“For every positive indicator, there is an indicator on the other side that’s worrisome,” said Jared Bernstein, former chief economist to Vice President Joe Biden who’s now with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics whose data is often cited by Democrats and Republicans, said that for all the encouraging signs, the economy still faces drags. That includes deficit reduction measures that helped reduce the debt in the long term but could cost the economy 1 percentage point in growth next year.

Washington politics poses its own challenges.

“I don’t think 2012 is going to be a break out year for the economy,” he said. “It is an election year and there is going to be a fair amount of political acrimony back and forth. People in business are already on edge. It doesn’t take a lot for them to remain anxious and nervous.”

.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon WordPress Plugin | Android Forum | Hud Software

4